are the cases of cancer uniform throughout the world

Clin Colon Body part Surg. 2009 Nov; 22(4): 191–197.

Colorectal Cancer

Edgar Albert Guest Editor Robin P. Boushey M.D., PH scale.D.

Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Relative incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Risk Factors

Fatima A. Haggar

¹Department of Surgery, The Outaouais Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa river, Ontario, Canada

²Schooling of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

Old World robin P. Boushey

¹Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Capital of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

ABSTRACT

In this article, the incidence, mortality rate, and natural selection rates for colorectal cancer are reviewed, with attending salaried to territorial variations and changes over clock time. A concise overview of known run a risk factors associated with colorectal cancer is provided, including familial and heritable factors, as good equally environmental lifestyle-related risk factors much as physical inactivity, obesity, smoky, and alcohol consumption.

Keywords: Large intestine Cancer the Crab, epidemiology, incidence, survival, risk factors

INCIDENCE OF COLORECTAL Genus Cancer

Colorectal cancer is a Major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world.¹ It accounts for over 9% of wholly cancer incidence.² ^, ³ It is the third most common cancer international and the fourth most vernacular cause of death.² It affects men and women almost equally, with just over 1 million unweathered cases canned in 2002, the just about recent year for which international estimates are available.¹ ^, ⁴ ^, ⁵ ^, ⁶ Countries with the highest relative incidence rates admit Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States, and parts of Europe. The countries with the lowest risk include China, India, and parts of Africa and Southern America.³

In the U.S. government, colorectal cancer is the third most inferior cancer diagnosis among hands and women (Figs. 1 and 2).⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ ^, ¹⁰ ^, ¹¹ ^, ¹² There are kindred relative incidence rates for cancer of the colon in both sexes, and a slight male predominance for rectal cancer.² ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ In 2005, the well-nig recent year for which U.S. statistics are currently available, ~108,100 and 40,800 individuals were diagnosed with cancer of the colon and rectum, respectively.⁷ For 2008, it was estimated that ~148,900 new cases would be diagnosed and ~49,900 people would die of the disease.¹⁰ ^, ¹¹ ^, ¹²

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is ccrs22191-1.jpg

Peak 10 U.S. cancer sites in 2005: men, all races. From U.S. Cancer Statistics Working party.⁷

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is ccrs22191-2.jpg

Top 10 U.S. cancer sites in 2005: women, all races. From U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group.⁷

Geographic Variations

Worldwide, colorectal cancer represents 9.4% of all incident malignant neoplastic disease in men and 10.1% in women. Colorectal cancer, however, is not uniformly common passim the world.³ There is a big geographic difference in the global distribution of colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer is in the main a disease of developed countries with a Western culture.³ As a matter of fact, the developed earthly concern accounts for over 63% of all cases.⁸ The incidence rate varies upbound to 10-fold between countries with the highest rates and those with the lowest rates.¹ ^, ⁹ It ranges from more than 40 per 100,000 people in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and Western Europe to less than 5 per 100,000 in Africa and roughly parts of Asia.² However, these incidence rates may be susceptible to ascertainment bias; there may be a high degree of underreporting in developing countries.

Temporal Trends

Different populations worldwide experience different incidence rates of colorectal cancer, and these rates change with time. In parts of Union and Western Europe, the relative incidence of colorectal cancer may glucinium stabilizing, and possibly declining gradually in the United States.¹⁰ Elsewhere, withal, the incidence is increasing rapidly, particularly in countries with a high-income thriftiness that have recently made the transition from a relatively low-income economy, such Eastern Samoa Japan, Singapore Island, and Eastern European countries.² ^, ³ ^, ⁸ Relative incidence rates wealthy person at to the lowest degree doubled in many of these countries since the middle-1970s.⁴ ^, ¹² ^, ¹³

In the United States, male and female colorectal cancer incidence rates declined from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, followed aside a short period of stabilisation. From 1998 to 2005 incidence rates have over again declined—an average of 2.8% per year for men and 2.2% per year among women.¹⁰ These decreases in body part cancer incidence have been largely attributed to screening programs that may have improved the detection of precancerous polyps.¹¹ However, although national incidence rates have declined slightly over the last decade, the burden of disease remains elated, and disproportional within sociology subpopulations. For instance, in front the 1980s, incidence rates for white work force were high than for colorful men and approximately equal for print women. Since that clock time, incidence rates have been high for hands than women, and higher among the dark population versus the E. B. White population.

MORTALITY RATES AND TRENDS

Worldwide fatality rate attributable to colorectal cancer is just about half that of the relative incidence. Nearly 530,000 deaths were listed in 2002, that is, ~8% of all cancer deaths.² ^, ⁸ It is estimated that 394,000 deaths from colorectal cancer still occur worldwide annually,³ making body part cancer the 4th well-nig grassroots cause of death from cancer.² ^, ⁸ In the United States, large intestine cancer is the second leading cause of death among cancers that affect both men and women.⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ ^, ¹⁰ ^, ¹¹ ^, ¹² ^, ¹⁴ ^, ¹⁵ IT was estimated that ~49,960 people from the United States would die of the colorectal malignant neoplastic disease in 2008.¹¹ ^, ¹² ^, ¹⁶

In North America, New Zealand Islands, Australia, and Western Europe, death rate from colorectal cancer in both men and women has declined significantly.⁴ However, in some parts of Eastern Europe, fatality rate has been increasing by 5 to 15% every 5 years.⁸ In the United States, deaths from colorectal Cancer the Crab have decreased importantly by 4.3% per annum from 2002 to 2005.¹² The age-standardized death rate was 18.8 per 100,000 men and women combined per class.¹⁷ The up-to-date trends in fatality rate statistics from umpteen of the developed countries are encouraging. However, it is mostly difficult to interpret temporal changes in mortality Eastern Samoa they are influenced by trends over fourth dimension in incidence and selection. The incidence rate may be a more appropriate indicator of trends in disease occurrence. Colorectal cancer relative incidence is unaffected by changes in discourse and survival, although information technology has been shown to be influenced by built diagnostic techniques and screening programs.

CANCER Natural selection AND PROGNOSIS

Body part cancer survival is highly pendant upon stage of disease at diagnosing, and typically ranges from a 90% 5-year survival rate for cancers detected at the localized level; 70% for territorial; to 10% for people diagnosed for distant metastatic cancer.¹¹ ^, ¹⁷ In general, the earlier the stage at diagnosis, the higher the chance of endurance.

Since the 1960s, survival of the fittest for colorectal cancer at all stages have increased substantially.¹¹ The relative improvement in 5-class survival terminated this period and selection has been better in countries with high aliveness-expectancy and good access to modern special health care. However, enormous disparities in colorectal cancer natural selection survive globally and flatbottomed within regions.³ ^, ⁵ ^, ¹⁸ This variation is not easily explained, simply most of the marked globular and regional disparity in survival is likely cod to differences in access to diagnostic and treatment services.³ In the United States, the 5-class survival for large intestine cancer improved from 1995 to 2000 by more than 10% for some men and women, from 52 to 63% in women and from 50 to 64% in work force.¹¹ The increase in survival during this period was non uniform among racial groups, however, and was reduced among non-whites compared with whites.¹² ^, ¹⁷ ^, ¹⁸

NONMODIFIABLE RISKS FACTORS

Several risk factors are associated with the incidence of body part cancer. Those that an respective cannot control include age and hereditary factors. In addition, a substantial number of environmental and lifestyle risk factors may play an important persona in the development of colorectal cancer; modifiable risks factors volition be discussed in the future segment.

Senesce

The likeliness of colorectal Cancer diagnosis increases later on the age of 40, increases progressively from age 40, up sharp after age 50.² ^, ¹⁷ Many than 90% of colorectal Cancer cases occur in people aged 50 or experient.¹³ ^, ¹⁷ The incidence plac is to a higher degree 50 multiplication higher in persons aged 60 to 79 eld than in those younger than 40 years.¹⁷ ^, ¹⁹ Notwithstandin, colorectal cancer appears to be increasing among younger persons.²⁰ ^, ²¹ In fact, in the United States of America, colorectal cancer is now i of the 10 most commonly diagnosed cancers among workforce and women aged 20 to 49 years.¹⁴

Tables 1 and 2 reveal the proportion of men or women in the United States who will be diagnosed with large intestine Cancer all over distinguishable clip intervals.¹⁷ The time intervals are supported the person's current old age.

Tabular array 1

Percentage of U.S. Men WHO Develop Colorectal Cancer over 10-, 20- and 30-Twelvemonth Intervals According to Their Prevailing Age, 2003–2005

Occurrent Age	10 Years	20 Years	30 Years
30	0.06	0.29	0.96
40	0.23	0.92	2.29
50	0.71	2.14	4.06
60	1.55	3.64	5.06
70	2.51	4.22	N/A

Remit 2

Percentage of U.S. Women Who Break through Colorectal Cancer over 10-, 20- and 30-Year Intervals According to Their Current Years, 2003–2005

Prevailing Senesce	10 Eld	20 Years	30 Years
30	0.06	0.26	0.78
40	0.20	0.72	1.74
50	0.54	1.58	3.16
60	1.10	2.76	4.29
70	1.88	3.61	N/A

Personal History of Adenomatous Polyps

Growth polyps of the colorectum, namely tubular and villous adenomas, are precursor lesions of colorectal cancer.⁸ The lifetime risk of development a colorectal adenoma is nearly 19% in the U.S. population.¹⁵ Nearly 95% of sporadic large intestine cancers develop from these adenomas.¹⁹ An individual with a history of adenomas has an increased risk of nonindustrial large intestine Cancer the Crab, than individuals with no previous history of adenomas.¹⁶ A long latency period, estimated at 5 to 10 years, is usually requisite for the ontogenesis of malignity from adenomas.¹⁶ ^, ²² Detection and removal of an adenoma prior to malignant translation may reduce the risk of colorectal genus Cancer.²³ However, concluded removal of adenomatous polyp or localized carcinoma is associated with an enlarged likelihood of future ontogeny of metachronous Cancer elsewhere in the colon and rectum.¹⁶

Personal History of Incendiary Gut Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a term used to describe two diseases, ulcerative colitis and Burrill Bernard Crohn disease. Ulcerative colitis causes inflammation of the mucosa of the colon and rectum. Burrill Bernard Crohn disease causes inflammation of the ladened thickness of the bowel wall and may postulate any part of the biological process tract from the mouth to the anus. These conditions increase an individual's overall danger of developing colorectal cancer.¹³ The relative risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has been estimated between 4- to 20-fold.⁸ Consequently, regardless of long time individuals with IBD are highly encouraged to be screened for colorectal cancer along a more frequent base.

Family Story of Colorectal Cancer surgery Adenomatous Polyps

The majority of colorectal genus Cancer cases occur in persons without a class history of colorectal cancer or a predisposing illness. Nevertheless, adequate to 20% of people who develop colorectal cancer sustain other family members who stimulate been affected away this disease.² ^, ²⁴ People with a history of body part genus Cancer or adenomatous polyps in one operating theatre more first-arcdegree relatives are at increased risk. It is higher in citizenry with a stronger family history, such as a history of body part cancer or adenomatous polyps in any start-degree relative younger than age 60; Beaver State a history of colorectal cancer operating room adenomatous polyps in cardinal operating theatre more first-degree relatives at any age.²⁵ The reasons for the hyperbolic risk are non clear, but it probably due to inherited genes, shared environmental factors, or some combining of these.

Inherited Genetic Risk

Approximately 5 to 10% of colorectal cancers are a consequence of recognized hereditary conditions.¹⁸ The most inferior inherited conditions are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also called Lynch syndrome. Genes responsible for these forms of inherited large intestine cancer have been identified. HNPCC is associated with mutations in genes up to their necks in the DNA repair tract, viz. the MLH1 and MSH2 genes, which are the responsible mutations in individuals with HNPCC.² ^, ²⁶ FAP is caused by mutations in the tumor suppresser APC.⁹

HNPCC may account for ~2 to 6% of colorectal cancers.² ^, ¹³ The life-time risk of colorectal cancer in people with the recognised HNPCC-related mutations English hawthorn be as high as 70 to 80%,²⁷ ^, ²⁸ and the medium age at diagnosis in their mid-40s.¹³ MLH1 and MSH2 mutations are also associated with an increased congener risk of several separate cancers, including several extracolonic malignancies, viz. cancer of the womb, stomach, small bowel, pancreas, kidney, and ureter.² FAP accounts for less than 1% of all colorectal cancer cases.² ^, ¹³ ^, ²² Unlike individuals with HNPCC, WHO develop only a few adenomas, people with FAP characteristically develop hundreds of polyps, usually at a relatively young old age, and unitary or more of these adenomas typically undergoes malignant transformation as early as age 20.²² Away age 40, almost all people with this disorder will let mature cancer if the colon is not removed.² ^, ¹³ APC-associated polyposis conditions are familial in an autosomal controlling manner. Or s 75 to 80% of individuals with Armored personnel carrier-associated polyposis conditions cause an forced nurture. Prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis are possible if a disease-causing mutation is known in an affected family member.²⁹

Biological science RISK FACTORS

Colorectal cancer is wide considered to be an environmental disease, with "environmental" settled broadly to include a wide browse of often unclear cultural, social, and modus vivendi factors. As such, colorectal cancer is one of the leading cancers for which modifiable causes may be promptly identified, and a large proportion of cases on paper preventable.³ ^, ³⁰ Some of the evidence of biology risk comes from studies of migrants and their offspring. Among migrants from low-danger to speculative countries, incidence rates of large intestine cancer tend to addition toward those regular of the population of the host country.⁸ ^, ³⁰ For example, among offspring of southern Europe migrants to Australia and Japanese migrants to HI, the peril of colorectal cancer is accrued in comparison with that of populations of the homeland. As a matter of fact, colorectal genus Cancer relative incidence in the issue of Japanese migrants to the U.S. government now approaches or surpasses that in the white population, and is triad operating theatre tetrad multiplication higher than among the Japanese in Japan.² ^, ³ Apart from migration, there are some other geographic factors influencing differences in incidence of body part cancer. One of them is municipality residence. The incidence is consistently higher among urban residents. Latest residence in an urban area is a stronger predictor of risk than is an urban position of birth.⁸ This excess incidence in urban areas is more apparent among men than women, and for colon cancer than for rectal cancer.³

Nutritional Practices

Diet strongly influences the risk of colorectal Cancer, and changes in food habits power abbreviate up to 70% of this Cancer the Crab burden.³¹ Diets high in fat, particularly animal fat, are a major endangerment factor for body part cancer.³ ^, ⁸ The implication of fat, as a possible etiologic factor, is linked to the conception of the typical Western diet, which favors the development of a bacterial plant life capable of harmful bile salts to possibly malignant neoplastic disease N-nitroso compounds.³² Senior high school meat consumption has also been implicated in the growth of colorectal cancer.³² ^, ³³ The convinced connexion with meat usance is stronger for Colon malignant neoplastic disease than rectal cancer.³² Potential underlying mechanisms for a optimistic association of red pith consumption with colorectal cancer admit the mien of heme iron in red nitty-gritt.³³ ^, ³⁴ In addition, some meats are cooked at high temperatures, resulting in the production of heterocyclic amines and polycyclic fragrant hydrocarbons,³³ ^, ³⁵ some of which are believed to have malignant neoplastic disease properties. Additionally, whatever studies suggest that people who eat a diet low in fruits and vegetables may get a higher risk of colorectal malignant neoplastic disease.¹³ Differences in dietary fiber intake might have been responsible for the geographic differences in the colorectal incidence rates.⁸ For example, dietary fiber has been proposed as accounting for the differences in the rates of large intestine cancer between Africa and Westernized countries—on the basis that increased ingestion of dietary fiber may dilute fecal content, increase fecal majority, and reduce transit clock.²

Physical Natural process and Obesity

Several life-style-related factors have been linked to colorectal cancer. Two modifiable and interrelated risk factors, physical inactiveness and redundant body weight, are reported to bill for about a fourth to a third of colorectal cancers. In that location is rife demonstrate that high overall levels of physical activity are associated with a glower adventure of colorectal cancer, including evidence of a superman–response effect, with frequency and intensity of physical bodily process reciprocally associated with risk.³ ^, ¹⁶ ^, ³⁶ Regular personal activity and a healthy diet terminate help decrease the endangerment of colorectal Cancer, although the evidence is stronger for colonic than for body part disease.² ^, ³⁷ The biologic mechanisms potentially responsible for the association between reduced physical activity and colorectal cancer are beginning to be elucidated. Uninterrupted moderate physical activity raises the metabolic rate and increases maximal oxygen intake.¹⁶ In the long terminus, regular periods of such activity increase the body's metabolic efficiency and capacity, as well A reducing blood pressure and insulin immunity.³⁶ In addition, physical activity increases gut motility.² The deficiency of physical activity in day-to-day routines also bottom be attributed to the increased relative incidence of corpulency in men and women, another factor associated with colorectal cancer.¹⁶ ^, ³⁸ Several biologic correlates of being fat or obese, notably increased circulating estrogens and decreased insulin sensitivity, are believed to influence cancer risk, and are particularly associated with excess body part adiposity self-sustaining of overall body fattiness.¹⁶ However, the increased risk related with overweight and obesity does non seem to result only from hyperbolic energy consumption; it May reflect differences in metabolic efficiency.¹⁶ Studies suggest that individuals World Health Organization use energy more efficiently may be at a lower risk of body part cancer.³

Cigaret Smoking

The connection between tobacco cigarette smoking and lung cancer is well established, just smoking also is extremely prejudicial to the colon and rectum. Evidence shows that 12% of colorectal cancer deaths are attributed to smoking.³⁹ The carcinogens recovered in tobacco increase cancer emergence in the colon and rectum, and increase the risk of being diagnosed with this cancer.¹³ It has been estimated that 12% of body part Crab deaths are attributable to smoky.³⁹ Cigarette smoking is fundamental for both formation and growing order of adenomatous polyps, the recognized forerunner lesions of body part genus Cancer.⁴⁰ Larger polyps found in the colon and rectum were associated with long-term smoking. Evidence besides demonstrates an earlier average age of onset relative incidence of colorectal cancer among men and women World Health Organization weed cigarettes.³⁹ ^, ⁴¹

Heavy Alcohol Consumption

As with smoking, the regular consumption of alcohol whitethorn be related to with increased risk of developing colorectal malignant neoplastic disease. Alcohol uptake is a factor the onset of large intestine cancer at a junior geezerhoo,³⁹ ^, ⁴¹ too arsenic a disproportionate increase of tumors in the distal colon.³⁷ Reactive metabolites of alcohol so much as acetaldehyde can be carcinogenic.⁴² In that location is too an fundamental interaction with smoking.³⁹ Tobacco may induce taxon mutations in DNA that are fewer efficiently repaired in the presence of inebriant.⁴² Alcoholic beverage may also function as a answer, enhancing penetration of other malignant neoplastic disease molecules into mucosal cells.⁴² Additionally, the effects of alcohol may be mediate through the production of prostaglandins, lipoid peroxidation, and the contemporaries of free radical oxygen species.⁴² Lastly, advanced consumers of alcoholic beverage may have diets low in essential nutrients, making tissues susceptible to carcinogenesis.²

CONCLUSION

The transition from recognition of theoretically evitable causes of colorectal cancer to implementation of impeding strategies depends on the delineation of exposures well thought out to be causally related with growing of the disease. From analytical epidemiology, some brighten ideas get now emerged about measures for reduction the burden of body part cancer. In that respect are several factors considered to be causally associated with the growing of large intestine cancer. For instance, the take chances of colorectal cancer is clearly increased by a Western diet. Genes responsible the almost grassroots forms of inherited colorectal Cancer give also been known. Fortunately, the Brobdingnagian absolute majority of cases and deaths from large intestine cancer can follow prevented by applying existing knowledge about cancer prevention. Appropriate dietary changes, regular physical activity, and maintenance of healthy weight, together with targeted screening programs and early remedial intervention could, in metre, well reduce the morbidity and death rate associated with colorectal cancer.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Lyon: The World Health Organization and The Internationalistic Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002.

2. World Cancer Research Fund and North American country Institute for Cancer Research Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global View. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Search; 2007.

4. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Death rate and survival in knocker and colorectal cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2(9):424–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;55:74–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin D M. GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer the Crab incidence, fatality rate and preponderance worldwide. Lyon: International Agency for Enquiry on Cancer; 2004.

7. U.S. Malignant neoplastic disease Statistics Working Group United States government Crab Statistics: 1999–2005 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Wellness and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & National Cancer Found; 2009. Accessed Oct 21, 2009. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs

8. Janout V, Kollárová H. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacku Olomouc Czech Repub. 2001;145:5–10. [PubMed] [Google Bookman]

9. Wilmink A Dejection. Overview of the epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(4):483–493. [PubMed] [Google Bookman]

10. Jemal A, Thun M J, Ries L A, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2005, featuring trends in lung Cancer, tobacco usage, and tobacco curb. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(23):1672–1694. [PMC unfreeze article] [PubMed] [Google Learner]

11. Jemal A, Horsefly L X, Ward E, et alia. One-year study to the state on the position of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding endurance. Cancer. 2004;101(1):3–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. National Institutes of Health What You Need To Know Astir Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human being Services &adenosine monophosphate; NIH; 2006.

14. Fairley T L, Cardinez C J, Martin J, et al. Colorectal Crab in U.S. adults jr. than 50 years of age, 1998-2001. Cancer. 2006;107(5, Suppl):1153–1161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Labianca R, Beretta G D, Mosconi S, Milesi L, Pessi M A. Colorectal cancer: masking. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 2):ii127–ii132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. de Jong A E, Morreau H, Nagengast F M, et AL. Prevalence of adenomas among young individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(1):139–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Ries L AG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. Oracle Crab statistics review, 1975–2005. Bethesda, MD: 2008.

18. Jackson-Homer Thompson J, Ahmed F, German R R, Lai S M, Milton Friedman C. Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal Crab in the United States, 1998-2001. Malignant neoplastic disease. 2006;107(5, Suppl):1103–1111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. O'Connell J B, Maggard M A, Liu J H, et al. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are progressive in four-year-old adults. Am Surg. 2003;2003(69):866–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholarly person]

21. O'Connell J B, Maggard M A, Livingston E H, Yo C K. Colorectal cancer in the youth. Am J Surg. 2004;187(3):343–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Davies R J, Henry Miller R, Coleman N. Colorectal cancer screening: prospects for molecular stool analysis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:199–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Grande M, Milito G, Attina G M, et al. Evaluation of clinical, laboratory and morphologic portent factors in Aspinwall cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:98. [PMC gratuitous clause] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Skibber J, Minsky B, Hoff P. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellmann S, Rosenberg SA, editor program. Malignant neoplastic disease: principles & practice of oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Theodore Samuel Williams & Wilkins; 2001. Genus Cancer of the Colon and rectum. pp. 1216–1271.

25. Boardman L A, Morlan B W, Rabe K G, et al. Colorectal cancer risks in relatives of young-onset cases: is risk the same crossways all front-degree relatives? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(10):1195–1198. [PMC unimprisoned article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Papadopoulos N, Nicolaides N C, Wei Y F, et al. Genetic mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science. 1994;263(5153):1625–1629. [PubMed] [Google Scholarly person]

27. Jeter J M, Kohlmann W, Gruber S B. Genetics of colorectal cancer. Oncology. 2006;20(3):269–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Atomic number 13-Sukhni W, Aronson M, Gallinger S. Hereditary large intestine cancer syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and lynch syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(4):819–844, vii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Lynch H T, Lynch J F, Lynch P M, Attard T. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management. Fam Cancer. 2008;7(1):27–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Johnson I T, Lund E K. Reexamine article: nutrition, obesity and colorectal Cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(2):161–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Willett W C. Dieting and cancer: an evolving picture. JAMA. 2005;293(2):233–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Larsson S C, Wolk A. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Crab. 2006;119(11):2657–2664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Santarelli R L, Pierre F, Corpet D E. Processed sum and body part cancer: a inspection of epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60(2):131–144. [PMC free clause] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Kabat G C, Miller A B, Jain M, Rohan T E. A cohort study of dietary iron and haemitin iron consumption and hazard of colorectal cancer in women. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(1):118–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Sinha R. An epidemiologic approach to studying heterocyclic amines. Mutat Reticuloendothelial system. 2002;506–507:197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Lee K J, Inoue M, Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S, JPHC Study Grouping Physical bodily process and risk of body part cancer in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective subject. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18(2):199–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Bazensky I, Shoobridge-Moran C, Yoder L H. Colorectal Cancer: an overview of the epidemiology, jeopardy factors, symptoms, and screening guidelines. Medsurg Nurs. 2007;16(1):46–51. test 52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Campbell P T, Cotterchio M, Dicks E, Parfrey P, Gallinger S, McLaughlin J R. Excess body weight and colorectal cancer risk in Canada: associations in subgroups of clinically characterised familial risk of Crab. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1735–1744. [PubMed] [Google Scholarly person]

39. Zisman A L, Nickolov A, Post R E, Gorchow A, Roy H K. Associations between the age at diagnosis and location of colorectal cancer and the use of alcoholic beverage and tobacco: implications for screening. Curve Intern Master of Education. 2006;166(6):629–634. [PubMed] [Google Bookman]

40. Botteri E, Iodice S, Raimondi S, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels A B. Cigarette smoking and adenomatous polyps: a meta-analytic thinking. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(2):388–395; e3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Tsong W H, Koh W P, Yuan J M, Wang R, Sun C L, Yu M C. Cigarettes and alcohol in sexual congress to large intestine Cancer: the Singapore Island Island Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(5):821–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Pöschl G, Seitz H K. Alcoholic beverage and cancer. Alcohol Alcohol. 2004;39(3):155–165. [PubMed] [Google Assimilator]

are the cases of cancer uniform throughout the world

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2796096/#:~:text=Colorectal%20cancer%2C%20however%2C%20is%20not%20uniformly%20common%20throughout%20the%20world.&text=There%20is%20a%20large%20geographic,countries%20with%20a%20Western%20culture.&text=In%20fact%2C%20the%20developed%20world,over%2063%25%20of%20all%20cases.